Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betegy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Betegy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Run of the mill article about a start up. Most references are primary, press-releases and trivial business as usual report about attempts to get financing. Did get coverage in a WSJ blog, so that's something, even through blogs associated with bigger reliable news outlets are still, well, blogs (WP:SPS, depends on whether the parent company does editorial checks or not, and that's not really public info...). I think this story was also picked up by others, like, but in the end its a variant of WP:ONENEWS, and I don't think that's sufficient to make this company notable. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES, WP:CORSPAM for further reading. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 10:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - The WSJ "blogs" are not necessarily how we would think of blogs. Despite it having the name "blog", it is not the same as a contributor platform such as Forbes Sites or unpaid contributors for Entrepreneur. People can't simply sign up and post anything they want so there is editorial oversight with who they let submit content. With that in mind, that is the best piece available I could find. Now, all of its coverage seems to be surrounded by a general announcement of the company entering the market. This WOULD fall under WP:ONENEWS so there isn't anything else that meets WP:ORGCRIT. Until the company can generate press other than their general announcements, this falls under WP:TOOSOON. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.