Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Hood (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cerebellum (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Beth Hood
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hood was bot Miss Tennessee and Miss Tennessee USA. Neither of these titles on their own is enough to make one notable, so the combination of the two titles does not make one notable either. The sourcing is just not there and my search for more sources just showed up lots of blog type sources, nothing reliable. The article has major sourcing problems too. Her marriage is sourced to basically a paid wedding annoucement, but it is more an unpaid posted on the internet one. The sourcing does not establish notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Being a beauty pageant winner is not enough in itself to prove notability.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 03:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as still a pageant membership is not significant for actual notability as a whole. SwisterTwister   talk  23:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Miss Tennessee USA, mentioned there. SST  flyer  14:56, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a WP:PSEUDO BLP on an unremarkable individual. I don't see a need for a redirect as the name is unlikely to be a valid search term. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.