Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Sholom Day Camp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was to relist. See Articles for deletion/Jewish summer camps and local organizations Dr Zak 02:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Beth Sholom Day Camp
Completely unnotable. The article is two sentences one, the first has the name and its location, and the second describes the activities offered at the camp, which are typical of all summer camps.  Páll  (Die pienk olifant) 18:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Article does nothing to prove subject's notability. Bumm13 18:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Ash Lux 19:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN --Bachrach44 19:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, not suitable material. Tyrenius 20:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Its a US summer camp. Unless the article can explain, through the use of verifiable information taken from reliable third-party sources, how this summer camp is significantly different from the standard, run of the mill summer camp, there is nothing we can do that the camp's own site cannot do better. -- saberwyn 03:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a pretty popular summer camp. There are plenty of other schools that have less members, why don't you nominate those for afd instead.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 08:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This article is up for deletion, and is the one whose merits or lack thereof are being discussed. If you can prove, through use of Wikipedia policies and guidelines why this article is encyclopedic and therefore should not be deleted, please feel free to do so. If you believe that a seperate article should be deleted, again by referring to the policies and guidelies, you are more than welcome to nominate the article for deletion, where its merits or lack therof will be discussed. This is not the place to dicuss the merits or lack thereof of other articles. -- saberwyn 10:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - it can surely be expanded, but the allegation that is non-notable is bogus. This editors in a rampage to delete every Jewish camp mentioned in Wikipedia but one. --Leifern 12:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I can't support a campaign to delete every Jewish camp, or very muslim camp, or every Catholic camp. Less than one hour after asking for expansion Talk:Beth_Sholom_Day_Camp this nominator put this on AfD. That is not a lot of time to expand the article now is it? Furthermore, why hasn't a merge been proposed? -- JJay 13:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm concerned about this campaign to delete Jewish camps. -- M P er el ( talk 19:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Being a stub is not a reason for deletion, plus PZFUN must stop his campaign for deletion of articles related to Jews. Pecher Talk 20:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Leifern and MPerel. Unfortunately, this article is part of a large group of articles that were recently nominated for deletion and about which there is at present much friction see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Nomination by PZFUN, and Speedy keep of several articles by Slimvirgin, so it would be advisable for this nomination to be withdrawn entirely ASAP. IZAK 22:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep As noted by others above, this delete request is part of a rampage to delete Jewish-related articles. If it is a stub, then expand it.  Perhaps there could also be a merge with other pages on Jewish summer camps into a general article on Jewish summer camps and how they are different from "run-of-the-mill" US summer camps (i.e., their role in ethnic identify of Jews, history re: Jews being not welcome and/or proselytized by Christians in other summer camps, use of Hebrew and Yiddish languages at these camps, etc.)  But simply deleting all Jewish summer camps as "not notable" smacks of a hidden agenda against Jews. Rooster613 23:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Rooster613Rooster613 23:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per comments above. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  01:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and lack of encyclopedic value.--Peta 02:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.