Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bethel Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 00:08, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Bethel Church
Non-notable local church. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:54, 24 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep all churches.--Nicodemus75 05:54, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * There are many churches out there almost none are notable this is one of them --JAranda &#124; watz sup 14:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Most individual churches are non-notable, as opposed to denominations which generally are notable. This article contains minimal information beyond the statement that "the congregation has been actively involved in the community since its inception."  Delete as non-notable. --Metropolitan90 06:13, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Gamaliel 07:16, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator.--Isotope23 16:46, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:47, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above arguments. Don't keep all churches. Punkmorten 20:46, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Denni &#9775; 02:56, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep, established church. Kappa 18:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Youngamerican 22:43, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --JAranda &#124; watz sup 14:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete inherently unnotable. Dottore So 12:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.