Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beto y sus Canarios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Billboard charts have asserted the notability here. (non-admin closure) Jalen D. Folf   (talk)  13:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Beto y sus Canarios

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG. A Google search brings up sources from local news across the subject's country, but I cannot confirm their reliability due to a language barrier on my part. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  05:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jalen D. Folf   (talk)  05:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  Jalen D. Folf   (talk)  05:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Just because you dont speak spanish and can't understand it? That's awful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GolazoGolazo1234 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Lack of English-language news reliable sources is not a good reason to delete an article if the subject is more well-known in a foreign-language per WP:NONENG. Use WP:TRLA if you can't verify sources not written in English. Also a quick Google search brings up the fact that they have charted on the Billboard Latin charts (Source) and received Lo Nuestro awards nominations as mentioned in the article. Erick (talk) 12:01, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - I appreciate it can be tough assessing the reliability of foreign-language sources (which is different to simply not understanding or taking the time to translate them, as suggested above), but the sheer number of results should probably have been a clue to do some more digging or get some assistance from WP:MEXICO before nominating. Hugsyrup (talk) 12:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.