Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betrayal (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cited and now clearly notable. Overall consensus to keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:37, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Betrayal (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Uncited stub about a 1999 book on politics. Not notable and completely uncited. Ogress smash! 22:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. It took me a while, but I did find some stuff in Highbeam after I waded through all of the false positives. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Well the "completely uncited" is taken care of and the article is now acceptable. SwisterTwister   talk  05:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.