Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betrinac (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Betrinac
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unwisely accepted from AfC - no reason is apparent why this brand should be notable  DGG ( talk ) 20:14, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme ( talk )  00:20, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. As written, a commercial product that fails to explain its notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:03, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.