Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better New Zealand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Better New Zealand

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article appears to not be notable, as it fails WP:SUSTAINED. Notable topics must attract attention over a sufficiently significant period of time. This organisation received some coverage in mid-October 2018 but has not appeared in any independent sources since. HenryCrun15 (talk) 00:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. HenryCrun15 (talk) 00:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. HenryCrun15 (talk) 00:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Cautious delete Never registered, doesn't look like its going to run candidates, so fails notability. But we'll know for certain at 2pm tomorrow when the candidate lists go up here. --IdiotSavant (talk) 00:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Candidate info has confirmed they are not running anyone, so I support deletion.--IdiotSavant (talk) 02:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete appears to be a fringe group. Graywalls (talk) 06:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. -Hatchens (talk) 07:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fringe political party with little or no in-depth coverage of them as a political party. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.