Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty (porn star) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was consensus to delete. Cool Hand Luke 00:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Betty (porn star)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. In 2 years since the first AfD, no substantial secondary sources have been added, only one site which (trivially) lists her films. There is no indication in the article that she meets the guidelines; no notable awards, coverage in the mainstream media, etc. are claimed. Also, as is well known, a long filmography is not an indicator of notability for pornographic actors, since such films can easily be produced by the dozen. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 18:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOTE. If all the folks in the first AFD had found one additional source, there would be plenty.  A notable actor should have at least something written about her in something. Perhaps there is a german language source?  But has been 2 years without one it seems. Obina 18:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Definite NN. As mentioned, the only "source" is just a link to a filmography, which is listed, and shouldn't be in the article anyway.  Major POV comes across as pure Advertising. Pretty sure this qualifies for a speedy deletion. ->Btl 19:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k 21:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing but a film database entry with spammy intro. • Gene93k 21:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Source(s) poor and non existant; been around a long time with very little interest or improvement. --Stormbay 03:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Comments in the prior AfD imply that she met the requirements for Notability (Pornographic actor). OTOH, the article doesn't reflect that data. jonathon 09:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Please cite a reliable source that backs up the claims in the prior AfD. All porn stars are "well known" and "famous." Notability needs to come from a WP:RS not related to the subject and not selling the subject's products. The old Notability (pornographic actors) guideline said that too. • Gene93k 10:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. In the old WP:PORNBIO this would have fallen under the niche performer area. She has been prolific in her area and appears to be well know for that.  Just because these are German films it makes English sources difficult to find.  However this article needs to be deleted as a copyvio of [] and not for lack of notability. Vegaswikian 21:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced and doesn't meet in any verifiable way the ridiculously lax standards of the Wikiporn project. VivianDarkbloom 22:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find any significant coverage on Google (English or German). Epbr123 22:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find any significant coverage on Google (English or German). Epbr123 22:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.