Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Bowers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Landover Baptist Church. The Bushranger One ping only 01:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Betty Bowers

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article subject lacks independent, meaningful sources. The majority of the sources provided are self-referential and searching for independent sources only provides trivial mentions (such as someone saying "this is a really funny video"). JayHubie (talk) 16:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to Landover Baptist Church. The level of coverage warrants mention, but not a standalone article. --BDD (talk) 01:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect - not substantial on its own. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  20:33, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. There is some (limited) independent notability, but it is weak. The Landover Baptist Church article is not so cumbersome that it does not have room for a compete section on Betty Bowers, so she belongs there where she will be at home. A redirect from Betty Bowers will help to prevent future attempts to create a separate article.  David_FLXD  (Talk) Review me 17:53, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. Had a look for sources, can't find anything. Merging and redirecting what's here into the Landover Baptist article seems reasonable. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:03, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect - Fictional (but hilarious) character whose only notability is intrinsically tied to the fictional organization she fictionally promotes. --Lquilter (talk) 22:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.