Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Harford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 19:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Betty Harford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as insufficiently notable actress. Quis separabit? 02:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep She had a couple probably notable roles (Inside Daisy Clover, Paper Chase, Dynasty, maybe Hitchcock Presents?) to pass WP:NACTOR but I'm having difficulty finding good sources to flesh it out, at least online - the ones I can find just show WP:V. Don't mind if it gets deleted for failing WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  talk  06:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong delete The roles amount to a few minor television roles. If these are enough to count as "significant", that word is being clearly abused. Harford had no significant roles, so she does not rise to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep notable roles in Dynasty, Inside Daisy Clover, Paper Chase Atlantic306 (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep on account of subject meeting the notability criterion. Recurring and/or permanent roles in hit TV-series are almost never "minor roles"; they're significant, so #1 and possibly #2 of WP:NACTOR are met. -The Gnome (talk) 12:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.