Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty ann d'agostino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 17:47, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Betty ann d'agostino

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

According to the "Invalid Criteria" section of WP:BIO, simply being the mother of Tim McGraw (or having known his father) does not make Ms D'Agostino notable. ubiquity (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No personal notability. And there's enough about her on the Tim McGraw page. LaMona (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Don't delete. I wrote this and don't think we should delete it.  I think it is correct that she has been written about mostly because she is the mother of Tim McGraw and her relationship with his father Tug.  But I think that there has been enough written about her that we should have an article. The Invalid Criteria section that is mentioned above says if you read it that it does not apply if there is significant coverage. I think she has significant coverage. You can see some of it here - https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Betty+ann+d%27agostino%22&num=50&gws_rd=ssl Spring1452 (talk) 23:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete:  Not worth a separate article.  For our readership, this should be covered at the Tim McGraw page, which is the only context in which it makes sense.  This is the way we treat innumerable similar cases.  Separate articles are only logical when you're a parent of someone hugely famous, in which case a lot gets written about you as well, see, e.g., Mary Ball Washington.  To be clear, no one is saying that Wikipedia should not contain content about this Betty ann d'agostino, just that it should not be a separate article.--Milowent • hasspoken  11:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.