Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betzalel Ambar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Betzalel Ambar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable jewellery designer. Sources in the article are all name-drops or the subject's website, and Google News gives nothing better (Strings: "Bez Ambar" and "Betzalel Ambar"). —A little blue Bori v^_^v  Onward to 2020 22:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)


 *  Delete  : Fails to meet WP:N Tatupiplu'talk
 * Delete - notability claim of "inventing Princess cut" is not supported in any reliable sources. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete; the main claim to fame appears to be the DeBeers Award. Unfortunately the link doesn't point to an article on this supposed award, the source doesn't mention such an award, and I could find no indication whatever in independent reliable sources that Ambar won such an award. The rest is trivial passing mentions or non-independent sources. Huon (talk) 23:51, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: With respect to the sources added by, none of them are useful - two are patents, the last a blog. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Onward to 2020 01:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: I've added several new sources including one from the GIA.edu, one of the most reputable diamond related sources in existence, and 2 patents. I'm not sure if the patents are useful, however, the statement is about the creation of these items and these are designs patent. —User:Finishedfirst 04:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Patents generally are not usable as sources, especially not for notability. And the GIA blog is a passing mention, likewise useless for notability. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Onward to 2020 06:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


 * delete the article is built on primary sources and original research. To be notable people have to have been the subject of secondary sources in reliable publications. Wikipedia is not a platform to publish your own original research, although many undergraduate students over the years have done so. Wikipedia is not a place to put up your first round of original research on anything.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.