Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beulah, Gilead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. Canley (talk) 23:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Beulah, Gilead

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The very first edit copies almost word-for-word from | this page from a government body. Although this has been linked, it is still a violation of WP:CV. Although subsequent edits have been made, almost all of the content is copied from the aforementioned webpage. However, I do not believe it to be a G12 violation. EvanTaylor1289 (talk) 21:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oops - so sorry, I realised that the article did attribute (although I did double-check the article before nomination, I missed that bit out twice). Can I request a speedy keep? EvanTaylor1289 (talk) 21:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. EvanTaylor1289 (talk) 21:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)


 * This is not Copyright problems. Uncle G (talk) 21:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong keep and Speedy keep - this is not a copyvio and this not an AfD issue. The Office of Environment and Heritage is part of the NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, and their web content has Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licenses (which the Wikipedia page makes very clear at the bottom) - meaning this isn't an issue. There are a lot of pages with OEH excerpts from the heritage register as there was a concerted effort by a number of editors a few years back to add NSW heritage items to Wikipedia. This page should not have been brought to AfD and I ask the nominator, to close it. Deus et lex (talk) 21:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * STRONG KEEP. SPEEDY KEEP. This page meets all the requirements for attribution is NOT WP:CV. This article is one of many articles that have been sourced, in part or whole, from the NSW Government OEH Database of Heritage Items and are sites located in New South Wales that are considered of significant heritage importance to that state. Request nomination be removed ASAP. Rangasyd (talk) 22:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.