Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beurshal Haaglanden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Slon02 (talk) 03:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Beurshal Haaglanden

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Except one of the two used sources, I can not find any reliable third party sources. Give a bit of a promotional feeling. Night of the Big Wind talk  14:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2011 (UTC)




 * Keep - There are more sources to be found under the market's old name of Darling Market. for example, .  -- Whpq (talk) 18:53, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Added these references. The Darling Market was nationally known in the Netherlands as is shown by a national Amsterdam based magazine writing about it. It is still one of the biggest convention/exhibition centers in the The Hague region especially after the demolition of the Statenhal in 2006. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 20:36, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It is quite amazing that is article should be notable on the English Wikipedia, while it is not important enough to merit an article on the Dutch Wikipedia, its home country... Night of the Big Wind  talk  21:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * What makes you think that it is not important enough to merit an article on the Dutch Wikipedia? Has the article been deleted there? Phil Bridger (talk) 22:07, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I just think it is strange that there was never an article about the place on nl-wp. Just strange. Night of the Big Wind  talk  22:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Not strange at all. There are many millions of notable topics that nobody has yet got round to writing articles about in the various Wikipedias. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:36, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * On the Dutch Wikipedia there are stricter rules about what is notable and what is not notable. Subject that do not show something special or proof their notability otherwise, are removed there. The English WP has lower rules for notability, but to my opinion notability on the "home-wp" of a subject should be taken into account, especially when the threshold is higher then here. Night of the Big Wind  talk  22:39, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Dutch WP rules don't apply here. Anyways I created a few articles about American subjects translated from nlwiki and dewiki which hadn't previously existed on enwiki e.g. One West Waikiki, Log Jammer (from nlwiki) and Willys 77 (from dewiki). People have to be interested in subjects somehow to create them, there are quite possibly a lot of subjects which don't have an article even on enwiki. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 00:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The Duth Wikipedia is not the "home-wp" Beurshal Haaglanden. Applying rules from other language wikipedias will make trying to sort things out impossible. -- Whpq (talk) 00:32, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Although the hall is only 15 years old, it does seem to have generated Reliable Source coverage. --MelanieN (talk) 22:55, 26 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.