Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverley Elliott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Beverley Elliott

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of an actress and singer, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for actresses or musicians. As always, actors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist -- the inclusion test for an actor doesn't hinge on simply listing acting roles, it hinges on showing that she's had a WP:GNG-worthy volume of reliable source coverage about her performances: biographical coverage about her, film or television reviews which single out her performance for dedicated attention, properly sourced evidence that she has won or been nominated for a major acting award, and on and so forth. But this is literally just "actress who has had roles", doesn't even say one word about her purported musical career at all after calling her a singer-songwriter in the lede, and is referenced entirely to a Twitter tweet and a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself in the first person on an unreliable blog, neither of which constitute support for notability. And the article has never been better referenced than this in the past, either, so the problem can't be solved just by reverting to an older version. Absolutely nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have much, much more and better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians,  and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Some limited coverage of a performance she puts on (stage show), but nothing for notability.  Oaktree b (talk) 22:13, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Bearcat and Oaktree. She's far from passing WP:GNG let alone WP:NMUSIC or WP:NACTOR. Cheers. JFHJr (㊟) 04:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. This is an easy call. Delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.