Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverley Owen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is topic is encyclopedic. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Beverley Owen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: non-notable actress. Am watching her now on The Munsters -- lovely lady -- wish her the best but her eight IMDb (7 on TV) credits do not constitute notability nor does anything she has done since retiring. Sorry to her fans but .... Quis separabit? 00:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep: The Munsters main character for full year... original cast for 38 episodes of Classic TV https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Munsters_episodes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dondowney (talk • contribs) 06:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Munsters. IMDb only credits her with 15 episodes, but whatever the number, it's her only real claim to fame, and that's not nearly enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep on account of major participation in munster hit TV show. Meets WP:ACTOR. -The Gnome (talk) 13:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to her role on the cult series The Munsters, Beverley Owen spent some five years on two major network soap operas, As the World Turns and Another World and played the second female lead in an Audie Murphy western, Bullet for a Badman. She also had leading guest roles in episodes of primetime network series. More than sufficient for notability and standalone article.   Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 17:08, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong delete The article has no reliable sources. This is strong indication that we should delete the article on a living person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - A lot of leniency is given to those where the internet clearly didn't exist at that time - We shouldn't delete BLPs who starred in films between 1956 - 1964 just because "there's nothing online" - I'd imagine there's plenty of sources in newspapers/offline, I honestly feel we'd be doing our readers a disservice by deleting something encyclopedic. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:48, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag for better sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.