Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverly Eakman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Beverly Eakman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional, oddly written, and relies entirely on primary or unreliable sources; Google search shows up nothing substantial; possibly a Scientologist? ─ ReconditeRodent « talk · contribs » 21:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. just promotional gush. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC).
 * Delete Not much in terms of reliable sourcing and Wikipedia is not a resume service. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. She has penned some books which are quoted/cited by many others in google books. One source mentioned she was involved in education legislation in five states, but didn’t give details. Her books are in a lot of libraries, and she’s written articles for some education websites which are widely viewed. I get the sense that there may be some book reviews offline or behind paywalls given that they date to the mid 90s. If so, she might pass NAUTHOR with some digging.4meter4 (talk) 15:37, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. purely promotional, reads like a CV. a speech writer does not pass GNG unless there is literature written specifically about her. --hroest 21:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG Masterhatch (talk) 23:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.