Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverly Hills Cox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Does not meet notability guidelines. Consensus is to delete ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 12:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Beverly Hills Cox

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No claim of notability. No references. No sources. Just an extended plot summary for a porn film that fails NFILMS and the GNG. All GNews and GBooks hits are spurious or, at best, trivial/passing mentions. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, it appears to fail GNG and WP:MOVIE. Cavarrone (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * delete all plot, does not meet WP:GNG Gaijin42 (talk) 19:52, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.