Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverly Naidus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn (non-admin closure) J bh  Talk  20:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Beverly Naidus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines, WP:PROF WP:AUTHOR and WP:NARTIST. The news articles I could find were passing mentions. The sources used in the article are not independent or are blogs. She is only an Associate Professor and her citation count is quite low with most publications in the single digits. J bh Talk  12:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn On further reflection. J bh  Talk  20:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sunmist (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep she and her work are written up in Art Journal, has reviews of her work (sources are in the article), she is also written up in The Jerusalem Post. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:GNG with improvements to referencing since nomination. Article could use further expansion not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.