Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beware Fashionable Women


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Beware Fashionable Women

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unlikely to meet WP:GNG Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:33, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing significant discussion in secondary sources. GoldenRing (talk) 09:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep'. The deletion nominator has not asserted wp:BEFORE is met, and in similar nominations, including others solidly kept, the nominator has refused to answer the question of whether they tried to assess notability.  It is not a requirement that every article has a plethora of sources;  stubs with no sources are allowed in wikipedia;  whether a topic is notable or not is a different question, not yet explored here.  I am not personally into articles on bands and hope others more knowledgeable will comment.  But a moment's search finds this Examiner.Com profile article (hmm, Examiner .Com is blocked for some reason, so to see, drop the "Q" after "www." and the "Q" after "examiner." in the URL) for another source to add to what is in the article. -- do  ncr  am  23:38, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Yet another ad hominem, Doncram? Ask yourself whether a blacklisted site is likely to meet WP:GNG. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm not finding much in the way of sources. The only good one on the page itself is the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, which would be considered local coverage. The link to the issue of Music Connection Magazine is broken, but I wouldn't consider coming in 3rd on a list of unsigned bands to contribute much to notability anyway, and mere presence on a list isn't what I would call significant coverage (though if there was more coverage than a ranking and a blurb, maybe, but I doubt there was because a search of the magazine's own site brought up zilch). The rest is promotional/sales links and scattered music blogs. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:57, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.