Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beware of Darkness discography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Beware of Darkness (band). Kurykh (talk) 03:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Beware of Darkness discography

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Discography page is under 5kB, and artist page is just over 11 kB, which are not prohibitive lengths per WP:SIZE nor MOS:DISCOGRAPHY. --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Jax 0677 (talk) 13:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to Beware of Darkness (band). The articles are small enough that they don't need to be separated, but I see no good reason to delete here. --Michig (talk) 07:00, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, I concur with your merge proposal. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Given that there are no other opinions here, would you be amenable to withdrawing the nomination and merging the articles? --Michig (talk) 17:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, I tried to PROD the article, however, that got reverted, stating "The information on this page is needed because the discography section on the band's article is for studio albums only". Without a record of decision, my merge could easily be reverted before the article and its discography grow sufficiently. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:50, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.