Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bexhill in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as unencylopedic trivia. Closed after four days per WP:SNOW. Daniel Case 02:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Bexhill in popular culture

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NOT loosely associated topics. This isn't a page about Bexhill's influence on popular culture, it's two trivial mentions of the town in a novel and a radio show, and a film that has scenes set there. The titles listed cover 70 years, but there are only three references which shows that "Bexhill in popular culture" isn't a notable enough topic for an article. Crazysuit 23:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable in the least, with only three "in popular culture" examples. This is the lamest "in popular culture" list I've ever seen. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no influence in popular culture, it's just using it, trivially, as a setting. --Calton | Talk 00:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bexhill-on-Sea already mentions all 3. Completely inadequate for a separate article. PrimeHunter 01:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable and a duplication. Although it's nice to see a pop culture article that doesn't define "popular culture" as "meaningless and irrelevant mentions on American television", I don't see that "meaningless and irrelevant mentions on television programs from other countries" is much better. -- Charlene 04:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * delete I am going to be so glad when all the in popular culture articles have been weeded out. Kripto 10:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Better stock up on anti-depressants... Clarityfiend 14:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Bold text
 * Delete per nom. Greg Grahame 12:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom & ample precedent. Carlossuarez46 16:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.