Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyblade 2000


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. W.marsh 14:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Beyblade 2000

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think every season of a tv show is supposed to have an article (I did a quick search on various sci-fi shows and none of them to be knowledge had specific seasonal articles). Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance. These seasonal articles have none of those context or analysis.
 * I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason, that is non-notable seasonal articles:

Macktheknifeau 14:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. As per arguments made just yesterday. This is/was a program that is shown globally. Google test 'Beyblade cartoon' comes up with a lot of results. Why the hate? -- En dl ess Dan  15:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment This has nothing to do with the original articles AFD. Regardless of if it was "shown globally", these season articles do not warrant their own page. Macktheknifeau 15:12, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * So then what's your argument? According to your nomination, it's that *you* don't feel that every show deserves it's own page. Which I agree with, to an extent. However, this isn't a local access show we're discussing. When a show yields hundreds of results as per a simple Google test and is screened in multiple countries - this clearly demonstrates notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Endlessdan (talk • contribs) 15:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I do believe Macktheknifeau is stating that individual seasons of a show do not inherently deserve an article, nor do they inherit notability from the show itself. -- 68.156.149.62 17:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, that is exactly what I mean. The seasons have no notability, nothing I could find supports the notion that they should have seperate articles on each season, and the articles make no attempt to show why each specific season of this tv show is notable. Delete these non-notable season articles, and put them in the original page's thread. Macktheknifeau 14:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, sems notable enough to me. Stifle (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge. Pointy argument yesterday really annoys me. Anyways, with the nom's attitude and the really large number of google hits I think this is at best articles needing expansion or at worst a merge to the main article.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Nominator incorrectly describes a separate series as a season, even though this is clearly stated at the start of the article - this is comparable to calling Deep Space 9 a season of Star Trek. Even if the articles were just seasons, not series, there's plenty of precedent for keeping them, look at 24 (TV series) which has seperate articles for every season, or Star Trek: Deep Space Nine which has articles for every single episode.  Edward321 03:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.