Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Hell/Above Heaven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 23:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Beyond Hell/Above Heaven
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NALBUMS C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 08:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep This article should not be deleted and should be kept because it meets all Wikipedia requirements for an article of this type. For example the article is sourced with the band's official website stating the announcement of the new album's title and projected 2010 release.  This shows us that the article is contains information on an album that is going to be made.  I believe that the most viable source you can have for an article of this type would be the band themselves announcing this and that is exactly what we have here.  I will attach the same reference used in the article here for easy access and viewing, thank you. Volbeatfan (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and Delete After reading your responses I change my mind and merged this article to Volbeat and vote to delete the album's article until the album is released. --Volbeatfan (talk) 22:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * per WP:NALBUMS "Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources." 2 of the sources come from the band site, so not independent and one is a video from the band. C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 18:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I understand what you are saying however but I believe that this article doesn't warrants the course of action you have taken. I understand you have taken this rule strictly but I hope you will allow for further opinions to be weighed in on this issue.  I believe this article deserves to remain on Wikipedia, especially when compared with other articles marked for deletion. Volbeatfan (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This album will likely become notable when it gets closer to release, but at this time there is no confirmed track listing and a "tentative" September 2010 release date. Very little significant coverage in independent reliable sources; too much crystalballing to satisfy WP:NALBUMS. The band's main article contains a sentence on this upcoming album; that seems appropriate enough for now.  Gongshow  Talk 17:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.