Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond The Hunter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Beyond The Hunter

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This sounds like an article for a book that hasn't been published, possibly written by the author of said book. Mblumber (talk) 03:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I doubt that the entry was written by the author, as the grammar used in this article renders it almost incomprehensible. That said, the book has yet to be published and no notability has been established.  It may even be a hoax, given the way the article was written.--Daviddavey (talk) 03:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BOOK and WP:CRYSTAL. A Google News Archive search (including the author's name: Niels Blote) returns no results. It's probably a hoax so I've tagged the article as such. Cunard (talk) 05:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. My searches only find the Wikipedia article. • Gene93k (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - the infobox shows too many redlinks, the article is not formatted correctly, fails WP:BOOK, wp:v and wp:crystal. Looks like a hoax, vanity, Myspace/Facebook profile, something made up one day at school/work and more like a story itself than an article about the story (WIkipedia is not a webhost). Delete per all nominations above. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 08:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Looking up the author (with quotation marks) shows only the Wikipedia article. There's no evidence the book will be published any time soon, so there's no reason to have the article since it is not verifiable. - Mgm|(talk) 10:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BK. JohnCD (talk) 17:10, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.