Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond the Farthest Star (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:31, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Beyond the Farthest Star (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No WP:SIGCOV in RS, no reviews in notable independent sources. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep there are 3 critic reviews at Rotten Tomatoes . Only 2 needed to pass WP:NFILM Donald D23   talk to me  18:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * SPS and SPS, don't contribute to notability. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Respectfully disagree. Donald D23   talk to me  23:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * There is also a relatively in-depth review here by Desert Dispatch, although I am unconvinced it is sufficient to demonstrate notability or sufficient coverage, especially if other similar material doesn't surface. Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per The Desert Dispatch review linked above and the Commonsense Media review (linked at Rotten Tomatoes) which RSN determined was a reliable source for reviews, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Is L.J. Gambone a nationally known critic? Per NFILM The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * As per discussions at WikiProject Film nationally known critics refers to reviews in popular national publications. In any case the two reviews count towards WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 20:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - insufficient reviews that look like blogs. Doesn't meet WP:NFILM, per above. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  20:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Neither Commonsense Media or Desert Dispatch are blogs Atlantic306 (talk) 20:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes - correct. Excuse my phrasing.  I'm saying they are "blog-like", with the Wordpress layout, links to free offers in the footer, etc. I'm devaluing them since the sites don't seem that impressive. It's just not enough IMHO. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  23:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.