Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beywatch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was copyright violation (non-admin closure) 2 says you, says two  18:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Beywatch

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

The article makes no assertion of notability, and reads like a blatant advertisement for the consortium. Contested prod. Lithorien (talk) 19:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Zahariad (talk) 19:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)The text has been edited and modified to address the problem of Efficient Building Energy.
 * Speedy Delete Although the page is down for some reason, this article is largely a copyvio of portions of this, available through Google's cache. 2 says you, says two 20:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I prodded this in August for exceedingly weak sourcing. Nothing has changed. Abductive  (reasoning) 20:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, advertisement, copyvio. Andrea105 (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. &mdash; RHaworth 01:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Zahariad (talk) 08:08, 11 December 2009 (UTC)This text represents the opinion of a consortium of companies (including Telefonica, EDF, Fagor, Gorenje, Synelixis, ...) This is a new text, edited to be general, and avoid any avdertisments, but remain at the facts. The only reference to BeyWatch project is the title and the last link (which links to additional info for the interested parties). Additional link to www.paradiso-fp7.eu can be added, though the text there comes from the same authors. Donating the content could be also an option.With respect to Notability energy efficiency and the ways to meet it is according to my view quite notable...
 * Please read Notability. Efficient energy use is probably a notable topic, but that doesn't mean a company or group of companies doing it are notable because of that. Notability depends on independent news coverage, and several other things listed on the page i linked to. - Mgm|(talk) 13:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.