Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bezalel (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Bezalel (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. The company itself doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:CORP. This article is about Bezalel, not its products. If Bezalel's Ark charger is a notable product, it should have its own article. —  Newslinger  talk   02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Analysis of sources in article:
 * Crunchbase: Not significant coverage. Directory listing.
 * USC Viterbi Magazine. Not independent. Desribes Bezalel as a "USC Viterbi startup". Founder is alumni from university, and participated in its startup program.
 * Trend Hunter: Not significant. Passing mention.
 * Geeky Gadgets: Not significant. Passing mention.
 * Gadget Review: Not significant. Passing mention.
 * Gadgetsin: Doesn't mention Bezalel at all.
 * Bezalel: Not independent. Bezalel's own website.
 * TechCrunch: Not significant. Passing mention.
 * BuzzFeed: Doesn't mention Bezalel at all.
 * PC Retail: Not significant. Passing mention.
 * SiliconIndia: Not significant. Passing mention.
 * USC Viterbi: Not independent. See #2.
 * PR Newswire: Not independent. Press release from Bezalel.
 * Rugged PC Review: Borderline. Very little information on the company itself.
 * CSQ: Not significant. Passing mention of Bezalel in listicle with an entry for the company founder.
 * Apple World Today: Not significant. Routine announcement.
 * Business Insider: Not independent. Disclaimer at top of page: "The Insider Picks team writes about stuff we think you'll like. Business Insider has affiliate partnerships, so we get a share of the revenue from your purchase."
 * Business Insider: Not independent. See #17.
 * MilTech: Not significant. Passing mention.
 * I'm unable to find sources outside of the article that meet WP:CORPDEPTH. —  Newslinger  talk   02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * This article was previously accepted through Articles for Creation. On September 15, I moved the article back to draft space and notified both the article creator and the reviewer. The reviewer informed me that it would be more appropriate to send the article to AfD than to move it back to draft space. —  Newslinger  talk   02:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - This is a startup with one product. I assume subject of the article is both the company and its sole product. If this is an inappropriate assumption, as an WP:ATD, the article can be renamed and recast if necessary. Cited coverage of the company may be marginal but coverage of the product is robust. ~Kvng (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Response An article can be either about the company or the product, not both at the same time. Notability isn't inherited.  HighKing++ 17:21, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete– Even if evaluating the sources for coverage of the product, the sources are mostly routine coverage or lists of like-products and shouldn't be considered RS (in addition to many of them not being independent). signed,Rosguill talk 00:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the available sources appears to meet the criteria for notability of this company, fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 17:21, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The fact that this AfC submission had been declined six times should have been a huge red flag. Whoever moved it into article space needs a serious trouting. Number   5  7  12:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP scope_creep (talk) 22:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.