Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhadeshwar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 18:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Bhadeshwar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to pass guideline Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 17:04, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - Hard to assess, 'books' throws up many uses, but many seem to be other 'Bhadeshwar's. Article is in a terrible state but may be fix-able.Pincrete (talk) 18:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. However, while the existence and legal status of this populated place are almost certainly easily sourceable, the article may need to be stubbed unless further sources can be found. PWilkinson (talk) 23:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per above - No doubt about it the article is in a shit state but Villages/towns/cities are always kept regardless of the poor state, If this is the village that's in Bangladesh then there's tons of sources. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.