Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagya Chakra (2005 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Bhagya Chakra (2005 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 20:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Major mainstream film with top name stars, most of whom have Wikipedia entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited by the people involved. Where is the significant coverage of this film? BOVINEBOY 2008 20:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The very fact of participation by major stars makes this film notable. Our purpose would be to find and add media mentions of it, rather than delete its Wikipedia entry. The deletion would be of help to no one. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, notability is not inherited. I have done a search for sources for this film and have found nothing significant from reliable sources. We should not keep an article about a topic just because it might be notable because someone notable was attached. BOVINEBOY 2008 23:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Unless there is contention that a film in question does not exist, Wikipedians who see Wikipedia as a compendium of all films are likely to accept a film with major stars as notable by that very fact alone. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The bar for film to have a Wikipedia article is not set at "does it exist?" Per WP:GNG (the basis of WP:NF), "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." There has been no evidence provided that this film has received significant coverage. In fact, this very argument that you are proposing is specifically included as arguments to avoid at WP:NINI. Just because some one notable is attached does not guarantee that it should have an article. BOVINEBOY 2008 00:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment, User:Roman Spinner, notability is not inherited, please read WP:NOTINHERITED. I have seen that you were directed to also read WP:NINI and WP:GNG in another AfD, but appears you have not. Films must be judged based on their own merit. Who appears in them, who directs them, and whether or not there are Wikipedia articles on the English Wikipedia for those actors/crewmembers, or an article on the film on another language's Wikipedia are all arguments that have no merit in a deletion discussion.  Therefore, unless you can provide reviews to this film, or other coverage on the film that passes WP:NFILM, I am afraid that your Keep comment will be ignored by any admin closing this discussion as you have not addressed the concerns of the notability of this film adequately.   Donald D23   talk to me  22:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donald D23   talk to me  22:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.