Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagyashree Mote


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:51, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Bhagyashree Mote

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see how she manages to pass our notability guideline.Near rubbish-sourcing.Probable paid-spam.Nothing resembling non-trivial coverage in RS can be discovered. ~ Winged Blades Godric 17:32, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete under WP:G11 - definite case as it currently only serves to publicize a person. Requires substantial rewrite if not deleted. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * More evidence needed. Wikipedia covers such a vast area of content that no-one, however avid a deletionist, can say for certain. In such cases I feel the deletionist should check whether any regular editors specialise in Indian regional tv performers. Through long experience I have accumulated a list of co-editors whose interests correspond with mine, and I check with them to see if they agree with the deletionist. Please note I am not including vanity biographies here (eg Mark Daines is an exceedingly good bloke from Basingstoke etc") as usually they contain basic formatting errors. This article though looks "Wikipediary" so we need to do more research. Bashereyre (talk) 08:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notable for her role in the Priyanka Chopra film Kaay Re Rascalaa and the TV series Prem He. The problem of English sources covering Marathi-language pop culture being of crap quality is a universal one in this area which has nothing to do with her notability: it needs a cleanup tag and attention from a Marathi-language speaker, not deletion. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:55, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * In case it has evaded your memory, you need to provide sources. ~ Winged Blades Godric 11:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The English sources (checked against other sources) make clear that she held major roles in a notable film and a notable TV series (at least); beyond that, the article needs the attention of a Marathi-speaker due to the poor-quality of the English-language sources about the whole field. Mass nominating entire fields of people with a copied and pasted explanation and no individual inquiries as to their actual notability is systemic bias in action. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * A detailed reply may be viewed over here.In short, I don't buy your assumptions.I'm quasi-proficient (~Babel 2/3) in Marathi and did not manage to scrape anything non-substantial, barring non-reliable interviews and trivial name mentions. ~ Winged Blades Godric 13:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NACTOR as has prominent roles in films and television as shown in sources such as Times of India Atlantic306 (talk) 18:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Reliable sources devoting her non-trivial coverage, please! ~ Winged Blades Godric 02:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete A single reference doesn't cut it. If the reference were available, they would be put in, and removed for being non RS. Most of them are routine coverage, that are generated by early branding and marketing efforts. There are no genuine references, that talk about the lady herself, outside the branding. The lady has only been working for two years effectively, and the pattern for actors who are trying to get into the industry, is try it for several years, then if the succeed they stay. There is no evidence that she has left that intial stage. Until there is some some work that effectively establishes here notable, then she is not suitable for Wikipedia. Fails to assert WP:NACTOR.


 * I don't see any evidence of notablity for significant in multiple notable film, nor a large fan base or cult, nor a unique or innovative contribution to the field. I see an early stage lady actor, who is starting her career, with very stage early marketing efforts providing most of the coverage. Also fails to assert WP:SIGOV scope_creep (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.