Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhai Baldeep Singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  23:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Bhai Baldeep Singh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't verify that he meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Certainly no evidence, or even clear assertion, of meeting WP:MUSICBIO. Boleyn (talk) 19:18, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Many google news results about different instances. passes GNG. ChunnuBhai (talk) 08:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * , are you connected to the subject of the article? Boleyn (talk) 08:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not connected to the subject of the article. ChunnuBhai (talk) 05:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete candidates for office will get news coverage, but we have decided not all candidates are notable. Subject does not pass notability guidelines.
 * Delete. Unelected candidates for political office do not get Wikipedia articles just because some campaign coverage exists — campaign coverage always exists for all candidates in all elections, so every candidate would always clear GNG if that were all it took. Rather, to get a candidate into Wikipedia, what would need to be shown is that either (a) he already had enough preexisting notability to qualify for a Wikipedia article for some other reason anyway, or (b) the campaign coverage exploded significantly out of proportion to what most other candidates could show. But neither of those things is being demonstrated here at all. Bearcat (talk) 22:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.