Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhairav (2001 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Bhairav (2001 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Fails WP:MOVIE jsfouche  &#9789;&#9790;   talk  18:28, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment A released film by T L V Prasad, a noted Bollywod director. Poor current state might be a reason to improve. Input needed from Cinema of India.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This was the best source that I could come up with in English. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Me too. I'm hoping User:Sodabottle swings by after the holidays. He's a whiz at Indian cinema.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  chat 00:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. --vgmddg (look &#124; talk &#124; do) 00:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you please explain why you think this should be kept? This is supposed to be an attempt to achieve consensus by discussion, not a vote-counting exercise. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Without verification through reliable sources that the film does meet our notability criteria, it should not have an article. No prejudice towards recreation should such sources become available in the future. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 20:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.