Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhakharwadi (TV Show)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus to Keep (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Bhakharwadi (TV Show)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unnotable TV show. KingofGangsters (talk) 07:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - show receives reviews, sufficient media coverage to indicate notability:, , , , , , , . The first link there is just a repository of Times of India articles alone on the subject, and this only includes an English language search. Article needs improvement, but NEXIST applies. matt91486 (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 22:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of programs broadcast by Sony SAB as even with all those sources, the article remains thin.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Whether or not the article is thin right now is not particularly relevant, however, as stubs are acceptable articles and can always be expanded. NEXIST does not require incorporation into the article. matt91486 (talk) 23:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment It needs more than "it airs here and the plot is Romeo & Juliet", though. We need more, including actors, airdates and a much longer and more comprehensive synopsis for it to stay here as an article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * While I understand your position, and I certainly agree that the article would certainly be better for that information, the current quality of the article has no bearing on the topic's notability. matt91486 (talk) 05:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Passes WP:TVSHOW and article improved. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Passes WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 02:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:44, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable and with enough content added to make one concern on those grounds resolved. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.