Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhambra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 05:57, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Bhambra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Mentioned in a list of clans produced by one of several caste associations but not discussed in any significant manner in reliable sources. Sitush (talk) 08:29, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Tarkhan (Punjab) (I guess). Unable to find sources. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 05:38, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdraw -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:48, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Cannot really redirect because the article itself gives two alternates (Ramgarhia being the other). We could turn it into a dab but the only verification is a list of names. And it should go because at best it does seem to be just a name - not notable and arguably WP:DICDEF. - Sitush (talk) 06:16, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. How about a redirect to the city of Banbhore, since this source says "Bhambore (aka Banbhore) is famously known as Bhambra among Khudabadi Sindhi Swarankar Community". -- Green Cardamom (talk) 07:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * So now you want to redirect to a placename using a circular reference as verification? The clain is unsourced in the article that you link, despite appearances. Give it up: if the thing is notable then someone can always recreate it. - Sitush (talk) 09:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't know. Withdrawing from this. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:48, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 20:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.