Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhangarh: The Last Episode


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite arguments to the contrary from what appear to be WP:SPAs, this topic doesn't meet WP:GNG at this time. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Bhangarh: The Last Episode

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM: No coverage in reliable sources and no evidence to support notability. GSS (talk |c|em ) 09:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 09:07, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 09:07, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Added fresh notability from Bollywood Hungama, an independent and reliable source. WP:NFSOURCES, WP:NFILM and  WP:GNG are taken care of. -Amavaskiraat (talk) 10:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think just one source is enough to support notability and as per the source the film was released on 30th March but not received any reviews which is very uncommon for notable films. GSS (talk |c|em ) 11:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, this is not the only reference. We have Radio Mirchi, wynk and hungama also in the references which are all independent and reliable. I checked for your review concern, and found that the film was released on 30th March digitally across the platforms, thus formal reviews are yet not available. Though I agree that we need more references, I think we have enough sources for the article to LIVE with the template WP:TM. Amavaskiraat (talk) 14:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Radio Mirchi and wynk are not reliable to support notability and yes the article need more reliable sources which address the topic directly and in details. GSS (talk |c|em ) 16:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:15, 5 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:22, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG criteria for WP:Notability and cant possibly satisfy Notability (films) because it is an advertisement for a trailer of an upcomming film. I originally tagged the article and went to the talk page regarding issues. The more I thought about it, the more I realized there is just no notability for a trailer advertising a future film release. From the talk page: "This article is about a trailer, for a yet to be released film, and not the film itself. This means that it is promotional advertisement for a film with an unknown release date which is a future event. Other issues are the puffed up wording in the lead, "one of most haunted locations of India" that gets promoted to "the world’s most haunted location, Bhangarh". This is certainly dubious speculation, and even if there were multiple reliable sources, the wording would be subjective. Without attribution it is original research.
 * notability: There are six references. 3 references are from the same "Hungama, Bollywood" source (counts as one towards notability and the last one is a dead link), radiomirchi.com is an audio review which is advertisement, YouTube (Dark Moon - Horror Channel) is about the trailer, and "Wynk Music" is about the three songs supposedly on the film, and I didn't look at reference reliability. The title of the article is Bhangarh: The Last Episode, not Bhangarh: The Last Episode trailer. Otr500 (talk) 08:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep . The article was created from a neutral point of view from the sources available at that time. The pillar of WP:5P2 was justified. Out of the sources now present with the article Bollywood Hungama and Wyunk are totally reliable sources. Wynk is a platform of Airtel, which is independent and so the Bollywood Hungama. The article in reference says that the film is released digitally. I have checked all over and found full movie available on many platforms. It seems to me an independent film not with the backing of big studios, which may be the reason for only a few sources available. Also I have read several articles on wikipedia where the notability is a concern or not so many reliable sources are attached with the article. But those article exists and thus gives chance to our readers to access information related to them. Having a fewer notable sources attached should not be the criteria for deleting an article altogether. One of our five pillar is WP:5P5, this article deserves to exists with the template WP:TM. Amavaskiraat (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Amavaskiraat (talk • contribs)  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.
 * You can't vote twice, so I struck the keep here. GSS (talk |c|em ) 04:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article is not about a yet to release film. The sources says the film was released on 30th march'2017 digitally, links for full movie are available. puffed up wording needs the warning for citation, which is already there (Though an editor has added some notability for it now). As for as the number of sources are concerned WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV clearly says "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage".Aniltheultimate (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Again you can't vote more than once. GSS (talk |c|em ) 06:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete--Per nom. Winged Blades Godric 15:37, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * you seems to be in a big hurry to delete the article. This is my first vote. Aniltheultimate (talk) 07:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have strucked my comment and for your vote please read the above comment by which I think is a good explanation on why this article should be deleted. Thank you – GSS  (talk |c|em ) 09:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * '''Keep. I don't see enough reasons to completely kill the article. Vikasthefalcon (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC) — Vikasthefalcon (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The reason is very clear as it fails to pass our notability criteria and since its your 7th edit so far please read our general notability guideline and WP:NFILM to know why I nominate this article for deletion. Thank you – GSS (talk |c|em ) 07:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes I have checked WP:GNG and WP:NFILM and I am totally agree with Aniltheultimate that "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage". Also I don't understand on what basis it is being speculated in the discussion that source related to Radiomirch.com is an ADVERTISEMENT and sources related to Bollywood Hungama and Hungama.com are SAME (both are different platforms, the first one deals in entertainment and later one deals in digital music and both are operated by different editors and teams). Also why source related to Wynk.com are not considered for altogether, It is the digital music platform of Airtel and totally reliable. Thank and Regards. Vikasthefalcon (talk) 15:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.