Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharat Gaurav International Achievement Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Over three weeks now with no evident consensus on what to do with this article. RL0919 (talk) 00:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Bharat Gaurav International Achievement Award

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can find no independent RS coverage. Current sources seem to be press releases or self-published. There is a bit of coverage for one or more similarly named awards which seem to be unrelated (e.g. this story about a Bharat Gaurav award given by a football team to one of its players). AFAICT "Bharat Gaurav" means something like "Pride of India" in Hindi, so it could well be used for several awards. But the exact title, "Bharat Gaurav International Achievement Award", gets 0 google news hits, and a small number of results from a web search, mostly wiki mirrors. Also, current content is pretty egregiously promotional. Before recent additions, it was just a 2-sentence stub. Colin M (talk) 19:46, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:43, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep but strip back to the December 2018 version before the entire entry criteria were copied in and loads of junky sources added. Judging from who gives the awards and who else is present the awards seem notable. Coverage is modest, but there’s enough to sustain a stub for now. Mccapra (talk) 06:39, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * To my eye, the sources on the earlier stub version are also 'junky', or at least fall short of WP:SIGCOV. In order, I see 1) BollywoodHeadlines, which by their 'About Us' section seems to be a blog/user-generated content. 2) Primary source. 3) Photo gallery 4) Literally just a headline. Colin M (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Stubify per Mccapra.4meter4 (talk) 12:32, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:21, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a total lack of coverage that shows notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 13:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note that I've stubified it and kept the sources. Going through them now to see if GNG might be met, looks promising based on the national nature of the publications. JamieWhat (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.