Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharat Tiwari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 13:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Bharat Tiwari

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is largely promotional. It was PRODed and deleted (possibly twice: see Tiwaribharat, Aarushi2003) in 2012. The photograph in the article's infobox was uploaded in 2012 by. The current article was first created by and declined then resubmitted by. Since then it has been edited and promoted by anonymous editors.

The sources cited in the article don't particularly establish notability. A Financial Express article in the external links section does dedicate a couple of inches to him. But IMO, this is insufficient. —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 12:56, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  15:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  15:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  15:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not have significant coverage as per the criteria WP:SIGCOV or WP:NARTIST. Teh Asian Age article and the Financial express article above mention him in passing and attribute his comment about the topic of the article. We require an article in reliable media talking about the subject in great detail. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  15:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt I thought this was borderline, but after deleting many of the shady sources (a contact page, a book for sale page, a photos for sale page) used as sources, it's clear that the brief mentions in the sourcing that is left, and the promotional and exaggerated nature of the page adds up to a GNG fail. Salt may be required given past deletions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:55, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above Spiderone  10:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete don't particularly establish notability. SalmanZ (talk) 22:05, 16 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Person is not notable. Azkord (talk) 07:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.