Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhattacharyya

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 15:02, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Bhattacharyya
Seems like vanity to me. No major notability established. Delete. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 00:14, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Be sure to look at his other contributions which are advertisements for his companies. commonbrick 01:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. There is a Bhattacharya coefficient and a Bhattacharrya bound (which needs an article), but I very much doubt this guy invented either of them! -Splash
 * Delete: Vanity. Should be nowiki'd while on VfD. Geogre 02:38, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 07:42, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs, Me 08:24, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 14:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete lame vanity --Adun 16:21, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: If this deserves to be in here, so do a college suitemate of mine and my buddy at MIT, both named Bhattacharyya - it's not an uncommon last name. This is the equivalent of somebody named, say, Bill Lee making a vanity article at Lee. jglc | t | c 16:33, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete seems like personal advertisement to me.--Poli 21:11, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .