Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhavesh Joshi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   draftify to Draft:Bhavesh Joshi. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 12:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Bhavesh Joshi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced WP:NFF, tagged as such for many months. DMacks (talk) 07:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Sourcing is an addressable issue and not cause for deletion, specially when a topic is not unsourcable. Heck... just 4 days ago Times of India reported a casting change, and they reported on casting last month as well, as did Indian Express. I suggest we userfy it to draftspace with talk page instruction on WP:NYF and WP:NFF.  Yes, sources are available to verify the topic, but the major problem is that they do not give us enough pervasive and enduring coverage to merit being a possible exception to WP:NFF under its paragraph 3. The author can be counseled as to just when a return to article space makes sense. In the meanwhile, it can be written of and sourced in the director's article at Vikramaditya Motwane.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 10:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete Although I can find and verify some reliable sources as mentioned by User:MichaelQSchmidt, it does not qualify WP:NFF. Harsh  (talk)  14:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:57, 22 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Userfy to draftspace per the rationale of User:MichaelQSchmidt above. NorthAmerica1000 05:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.