Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhavna Limbachia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete, under WP:CSD Mojo Hand (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Bhavna Limbachia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Borderline notability, does not seem to meet any of the criteria in WP:NACTOR for inclusion. She has a recurring role in one television shows (not multiple shows as required), no significant roles in notable films. The existence of a fansite doesn't automatically suggest a large fan base. The source cited for being a fashion designer does not support the claim that the subject is actually a fashion designer either, but rather an actress knowledgeable about fashion. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete- At this time this actor does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG with only a role in Citizen Kane and some other minor roles in other shows and no sign of a significant cult following. The only source I could find for her to be a fashion designer was on her own fan site which does not qualify as a source.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.