Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BhavyaBharat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

BhavyaBharat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The website is nothing notable. Sources are promotional in nature! Aru@baska ❯❯❯ Vanguard 11:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

@ARUNEEK This is first kind of application providing more than 30 online services and basically providing online services to rural part and it is approved by digital india by indian government and it reduces unemployment and anyone can make money without investment by providing online services to public. Please check all these media articles

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZed9U_T2OE - Telecasted in Public Tv Kannada News channel. http://www.bfirst.in/news/itbt/9424/honey-they-shrunk-world http://www.pocketnewsalert.com/2016/06/First-of-its-kind-in-India-Jobs-through-your-Smartphone-App-that-provides-33-services.html

and The application used by rural population in india. and this application founded by Dhananjay Acharya from small village

Paytm is created in wikipedia no use of this.. but this one application providing online services to rural part and reducing unemployment.

This App helping and providing self employment.. but what Paytm company providing they are making money by providing services. but you people keep that page in wikipedia... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quietdhanu (talk • contribs) 08:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * - Hi all, for what it's worth, I just indeffed Quietdhanu for spamming newkannada.com across multiple articles. I believe he's part of an advertising ring and/or is engaging in sockpuppetry. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete I hve removed much of the advertorial the article contained; unfortunately that leaves insufficient content of any substance to allow it to pass [WP:NORG]]: no 'significant coverage in secondary sources.' Muffled Pocketed  09:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete  Varun FEB2003    11:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Varun  FEB2003    12:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete in a basic WP:BEFORE I found literally no other sources than Wikipedia and their website - David Gerard (talk) 12:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * speedy delete complete waste of time even thinking of keeping it. This one definitely has existential problems Light2021 (talk) 21:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as solely advertising, this is a newly started company which is simply looking for PR especially considering the factors listed here, the information and sources only consist of republishing what the company's own comments and words are, therefore especially not convincing and everything else is simply trivial therefore there's no salvaging an article like this. SwisterTwister   talk  23:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as corporate spam. Not sure why speedy deletion was declined. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.