Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhawarna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 01:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Bhawarna

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Very little information and no references whatsoever. I'd speedy tag it if there was one that is appropriate for this Trey  lander  12:34, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The article now has two references and is a valid stub. Consensus is to generally keep verified settlements, which this now is. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm still torn on city/town's inherent notability. I was able to find the postal code info and Catal found another reference which I find legitimate.  It's verifiable and verified.  Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 01:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Indian topics are always tough because there's frequently not a lot of information on the net in English and in Latin characters. Towns are inherently notable due to the presumption that sources exist, whether it be government or other records.--Oakshade (talk) 21:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.