Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhelatand sijua


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Monty 845  14:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Bhelatand sijua

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability questionable.-- Forward  Unto   Dawn  12:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

I forward Forward ManyVoxels (talk) 15:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment We already have an article on Sijua, which mentions the mining industry. Bhelatand appears to be a mining village a mile or two south of Sijua - describing it, as the article does, as a "region" seems rather overblown. It probably separately meets WP:NGEOG, though its notability does seem to be mainly in relation to the Bhelatand colliery. If kept, the article should probably be retitled Bhelatand - the two places, or rather their apparently separated but related collieries (which might just be notable in themselves), do sometimes get mentioned as Bhelatand-Sijua but they seem more often to get mentioned separately. PWilkinson (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm going to say Keep as g-satellite shows "BHELATAND" which seems to be a distinct community just south of Sijua and even has several businesses identifying themselves as "Bhelatand", ie "Bhelatand's Officers Club" or "Bhelatand Ground". --Oakshade (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.