Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhim Singh Rana Jat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 02:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Bhim Singh Rana Jat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Poorly sourced. WP:BEFORE search turns less than what's in the article. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Madhya Pradesh-related deletion discussions. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep as per this, this, this, this, this, this, and other Google book searches. Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Rana Bhim Singh, as that's his WP:COMMONNAME. He was an important ruler of Gohad State who also captured the famous Gwalior Fort in 1754. He is covered in plenty of scholarly sources: just search terms like Rana Bhim Singh, Rana of Gohad, etc. Here are some scholarly sources which can be used to improve and expand the article:
 * pp. 110–111, 139 of this book describe Bhim Singh's relation with the Bharatpur State rulers and their joint military expeditions
 * pp. 51–52, 148 of this book gives a detailed account of capturing of Gwalior fort by Rana and also of its subsequent siege by the Marathas
 * p. 87–88 this book describes the capture of Gwalior fort by Rana and the subsequent siege of Marathas;
 * pp. 44–45 of this book describes his capture of the fort and also his death in a battle
 * pp. 93–94 of this book discusses the mutual help provided by Bhim Singh and Bharatpur rulers and the attack of Marathas on the Rana.
 * So the article needs improvement, not deletion. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.