Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhojpuri Boys (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 10:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Bhojpuri Boys
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of meeting WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. This has been closed twice as no consensus because of a lack of responses. I'm hoping that the third time, this will attract more comments and that if not, it will be relisted several times so we can finally get an answer on this. It has been tagged for notability for over 6 years, so it is worth having it open for a while at AfD to sort it. Boleyn (talk) 06:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * They seem to be doing a noble effort on that local language but still do not have enough notability. Delete and maybe redirect the title somewhere. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 07:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The best redirect I could see was Music of Mauritius. Boleyn (talk) 07:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. See link to google books search.   There are at least 4 books that have them referenced as important cultural figures.-- &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 20:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (gossip)  @ 10:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Comment As this is still failing to attract many respondents, I just wanted to repeat that this has already been closed twice as no consensus because of a lack of responses. I'm hoping that the third time, this will attract more comments and that if not, it will be relisted several times so we can finally get an answer on this. It has been tagged for notability for over 6 years, so it is worth having it open for a while at AfD to sort it. Boleyn (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. This band already meet the criteria 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11 and 12 of WP:BAND and WP:GNG as well (look at the refs). I can't see why it is re-listed again and again while there is no reason for deleting it. Kingroyos (talk) 03:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: While relistings are typically limited to two, the two previous AFD discussions for this article were both closed as no consensus due to limited user input. Relisting again in hopes to obtain more input for this third discussion.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:27, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I would leave it be as no consensus. They are important in Mauritius, but apparently not much elsewhere. If push came to shove I'd say delete. --Bejnar (talk) 05:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.