Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhool (2019 TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I don't see a consensus here. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Bhool (2019 TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 19:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC) *Keep - A WP:NTV series, substantial sources, free images available on Google search. Rather than WP:AfD, should have been tagged for "Additional Citations".Sameeerrr (talk) 22:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 19:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Sameeerrr, NTV is an essay and you have to provide WP:THREE best coverage that you believe is sufficient to meet GNG. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 09:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't understand your approach of providing "THREE" best references. If we were supposed to provide the only three best references, then I wonder Wikipedia would have limited it WP:References section "To add Three Best sources" only. Sameeerrr (talk) 15:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * No, you do not "have to provide" three best sources. WP:THREE, meaning User:RoySmith/Three best sources, is not policy. The word three does not appear anywhere in Citing sources, nor does it appear anywhere in References dos and don'ts or Notability. You keep telling people how things must be done around here, and you keep seeming to indicate that policy says things it does not. Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 22:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 02:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_ARY_Digital - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  10:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep same rationale for almost every nomination. I am doubting WP:Before is done or not. Series received in-depth coverage, , , Libraa2019 (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Libraa2019, I'd like to evaluate each source individually. 1. This coverage is ROTM and lacks sig/in-depth on the subject, making it insufficient for establishing WP:GNG, though it may suffice for WP:V. 2. I couldn't find any mention of the subject in this Dawn Images story. 3. Similarly, the subject wasn't even mentioned in this The News story. 4. While this Daily Times coverage looks good apparently, BUT it's worth noting that the author has only contributed three articles under their by-line. Given Daily Times acceptance of guest contributions, such articles might be guest contributions. Thus, while they can be used for WP:V, but they may not good enough for meeting WP:GNG. And lastly, please avoid WP:ATA. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 09:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You mentioned that you could'nt find subject in provided source 2 and 3, i would like to clarify its also known as Daag as it was previouly titled Daag before release and producers change title afterwords. Libraa2019 (talk) 10:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Libraa2019, OK, I was unaware of this as it wasn't previously stated in the article. But nevertheless, provided coverage (this and this) is still ROTM coverage based on interviews -published in March 2019- to talk about the filming of the series. Remember Existence ≠ Notability. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 11:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.