Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhopal Pride March


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Bhopal Pride March

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:EVENT. no lasting significance as per WP:EFFECT. no wider geographic notability as per WP:GEOSCOPE. LibStar (talk) 00:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:EVENT. Lepricavark (talk) 00:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG and WP:EVENTCRIT, the latter of which states, "Events are also very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards". Source examples include, , , , , . North America1000 00:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep My searches show significant coverage from independent, secondary reliable sources such as the Times of India, The New Indian Express, Hindustan Times and The Free Press Journal; to name a few. The coverage goes beyond the WP:ROUTINE coverage you may expect. Purely having not recieved coverage in the New York Times does not remove notability. AusLondonder (talk) 00:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 04:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep – Seems to satisfy WP:GNG, the sources mentioned in the above keep !votes should be included in the article if its kept. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 04:18, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.