Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhutanese American


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. 1ne 06:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Bhutanese American


No information of its own, no notable expansion since creation in May. More useful as a redlink. Circeus 01:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   --  Ageo020  ( T  •  C ) 01:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Expand and Keep If this article can be expanded in a week, then keep it. Or else delete it. I'll try to work on it. -- Ageo020 ( T  •  C ) 01:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * comment I do not doubt the article is legit. However, in its current state, a redlink is, in my opinion, a better option than a pretension of article that contains no useful info whatsoever. Bruneian American was prod-ded without opposition, but the template was removed on this one by Bakasuprman, so I nominated it here, along with the others, which i ahd not noticed at the time. Circeus 02:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * If you can expand it enough by Friday I'll switch my vote. Same goes for other cases where I voted delete.--T. Anthony 20:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N and WP:CITE. Not notable and not even the supplied census table list any Bhutanese American.~ Feureau 03:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless expanded and references are cited. If this is work on, then it will be a keep. --Ter e nce Ong (C 04:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete As it stands I find little to indicate there are many, or any, Bhutanese Americans. Multicultural America doesn't have a section on it and the only article I found mentioned them as a "what if"?--T. Anthony 04:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Expand and Keep-as per Ageo020.  Nileena joseph (Talk 06:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete dosen't even define what a Brutanese American is. Atlantis Hawk  08:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; WP:CITE and WP:N for entire group of dash-Americans...SkierRMH 08:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The shortest article I have seen in 14 months of surfing Wikipedia --Aussie King Pin 10:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Special:Shortpages. Punkmorten 11:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "Bhutanese Americans are Americans of Bhutanese descent." Thank you very much for that!  From List of Countries does that mean we have to have 243x242=58806 such articles? --Steve (Slf67)talk 10:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doing a Google search, there would appear to be little information available for any kind of expansion. I'll change mine to Keep if someone can find enough information on the subject to fill out one of those ethnic group templates, portraits and all. Black-Velvet  11:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per T.Anthony. Punkmorten 11:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article includes no cited information about their arrival in the US, settlement, achievements, etc. --Czj 18:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.